This court allowed identical writ petitions relying on reasons recorded in a prior judgment delivered on 17.10.2007 regarding Writ Petition Nos.533 & 541 of 2003. The rule was made absolute and associated civil applications were noted as not surviving.
Rule made absolute; civil applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 521 OF 2003 AND
WRIT PETITION NO. 525 OF 2003
Ichalkaranji Urban Coop. Bank Ltd. ...... ......Petitioner V/s The Divl. Joint Registrar etc. ...... ......Respondent.
Mr.A.A.Kumbhakoni, Adv. For the petitioner.
Mr.Y.S.Jahagirdar, Sr.Adv. With Mr.Amit Borkar, For the respondent No.2 to 4 in W.P.521/03 and for R.No.2 in W.P.525/03. Mr.S.V.Sadavarte, Adv. For R.No.3 in W.P.521/07 & for R.Nos.3 & 4 in W.P.525/03.
Mr.S.K.Chincholikar, AGP for respondent No.1.
CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 22/10/07
PC:
An identical question involved in these writ petitions has
been decided vide judgment delivered on 17.10.2007 in Writ Petition Nos.533 & 541 of 2003 and the said writ petitions have
been allowed. For the same reasons as recorded in Writ Petition Nos.533 & 541 of 2003 the present writ petitions are also allowed.
Rule made absolute in terms as recorded therein. In view of disposal of main petitions civil applications do not survive.
22.10.07
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ Petition Nos.533 & 541 of 2003Followed¶11
Ichalkaranji Urban Coop. Bank Ltd.
The Divl. Joint Registrar etc.
A.P.Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
