Petition withdrew by counsel after the State agreed to withdraw the impugned notice and take appropriate legal action. Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 476 OF 2006
MRS. JOAQUINA PAIKA DIAS AND 5 ORS.,
....Petitioners
Versus
MAMLATDAR OF TISWADI TALUKA AND 2 ORS.,
....Respondents
Mr. Nigel Da Costa Frias, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. S. S. Kantak, AG with Ms. R. Chodankar, AGA for the State.
Coram:S.K. SHAH & N. A. BRITTO, JJ.
Date:8th January, 2007
P.C.
The learned AG for the State states that they would withdraw the impugned notice dated 05.10.2006 and take action permissible under the law.
In view of this, nothing survives in this petition. The learned Counsel for the petitioner withdraws the petition. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
S.K. SHAH, J.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
arp/*
MRS. JOAQUINA PAIKA DIAS AND 5 ORS.
MAMLATDAR OF TISWADI TALUKA AND 2 ORS.
S.K. SHAH
N. A. BRITTO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
