Petitioner withdrew the writ petition after a settlement with respondents and an assurance to withdraw a pending labour case. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 405 OF 2005
THE GODREJ AND BOYCE MANUFACTURING CO. LTD., PONDA, GOA.
....Petitioner
Versus
CHETAN NAIK AND 2 ORS.
....Respondents
Shri Valmiki Menezes, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri H. Shirodkar, Advocate for R-1(a) to 1(i). Ms. W. Coutinho, GA for R.2 and 3.
Coram:S.K. SHAH & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:8th January, 2007
P.C.:
The parties have filed the terms of settlement. They are taken on record and marked "A" for identification. The learned counsel for the Respondents No.1(a) to 1(i) makes a statement that the respondents would withdraw the Case No. CLE (MWA-5)/2005/570 pending before the Labour Commissioner, Panaji, Goa within one week. In view of this statement and the settlement arrived at between the parties, the learned counsel for the petitioner withdraws the petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
S.K. SHAH, J.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
sl.
THE GODREJ AND BOYCE MANUFACTURING CO. LTD., PONDA, GOA
CHETAN NAIK
S.K. SHAH
N. A. BRITTO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
