A single-paragraph order dismissing a writ petition challenging an order of the Settlement Commission due to lack of reasons for a seventeen-month delay in filing.
Petition dismissed due to unexplained gross delay of seventeen months in filing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD SHEET CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
WRIT PETITION No. 4751 of 2007.
-------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes,Office : Court or Judge’s Order. Memorandum of Coram : apperance,Court’s : Orders & Directions : and Prothonotary’s : Order. : -------------------------------------------------------------------Mr A.N. Kotangale, Advocate i/b S. R. Chauhan for the Petitioner.
None for the respondent.
CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND V.C. DAGA,JJ.
DATED:25TH JUNE, 2007.
Petitioner.
delay. Under these circumstances, we decline to
exercise our discretion. Petition is dismissed.
(V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise its discretion to hear a writ petition challenging an order of the Settlement Commission filed after a delay of seventeen months without reasons.
Petitioner
Respondent
D.R. Radhakrishnan
V.C. Daga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
