University of Mumbay Institute of Chemical Technology v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition is rendered infructuous and dismissed accordingly. No substantive decision is provided on the merits.
The writ petition is rendered infructuous and dismissed accordingly. No substantive decision is provided on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.
WRIT PETITION NO.45 OF 2004
University of Mumbai, Institute of Chemical Technology.
...Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...Respondents.
.... Mr.Ranjit Shetty i/b. M/s. DSK Legal for the Petitioner.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
August 1, 2007 .
P.C. :
This petition has been rendered infructuous and is
dismissed as such.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Dr.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
University of Mumbai, Institute of Chemical Technology
State of Maharashtra
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court