Suit No. 618 of 1994 in the Bombay High Court. The Plaintiffs and their Advocate were absent. The suit was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 618 OF 1994
Mr. Prabhakar Madhavarao Sagale & Ors. ... Plaintiffs.
V/s.
Mr. Anant Madhavrao Sagale. ... Defendant.
None for the Plaintiffs. None for the Defendant.
CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.
1ST AUGUST 2007.
P.C. :-
. The Plaintiffs and their Advocate are absent.
The Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Mr. Prabhakar Madhavarao Sagale & Ors.
Mr. Anant Madhavrao Sagale
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
