Nandkumar Raghunath Kamerkar v. Shamal Nandkumar Kamerkar and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/407/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
Issue for consideration
Whether the denial of the petition regarding reduction of maintenance due to demolition of the petitioner's shop is sustainable.
¶1
[1]
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶3
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 407 OF 2007.
¶4
Nandkumar Raghunath Kamekar ..Petitioner
V/s
¶5
Shamal Nandkumar Kamerkar & Ors. ..Respondents.
¶6
Mr. A.S. Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Y.S.Shinde, APP for the State.
¶7
CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J.
¶8
DATE : 5TH APRIL, 2007.
¶9
P.C.
¶10
. Heard Mr. Rao, learned Counsel for the
¶11
petitioner. Perused the impugned judgment passed by the
J.M.F.C. Deorukh and Sessions Court, Ratnagiri. The
¶12
learned Magistrate granted maintenance to the
wife-respondent No.1 at the rate of Rs. 500/- per month
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the denial of the petition regarding reduction of maintenance due to demolition of the petitioner's shop is sustainable.
Whether the petitions plea that the demolition of his Pan Shop rendered him unable to provide maintenance succeeds.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Nandkumar Raghunath Kamekar
- respondent
Shamal Nandkumar Kamerkar
Coram
AI extract
J.H. BHATIA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court