Petitioners filed a writ petition in writ petition no. 2319 of 2006 challenging an unspecified order. The petitioners' counsel did not press the petition, requesting only details from respondent no. 3. The court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed.
Writ petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2319 OF 2006
S. R. Tambe & Another. ... ... Petitioners.
Versus
The Municipal Corporation of
Greater Mumbai & Ors....... ... Respondents.
Mr. P.J.Thorat with Ms.Pranali Kakade for the
Petitioners.
Ms. A. K. Savla for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr. M.M.Vashi for Respondent Nos.3 and 4.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. &
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATED : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
P.C.:
Learned Counsel for the petitioners does not
press this petition. However, he states that
respondent no.3 should give them complete detail to
which learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.3
has no objection. This writ petition is, accordingly,
dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
CHIEFJUSTICE
Sd/-
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
S. R. Tambe
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
SWATANTER KUMAR
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court