The High Court rejected the petition for quashing the FIR because the charge-sheet had already been filed, thereby abandoning the exercise.
Petition rejected; no quashing order granted due to filing of charge-sheet.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.{1}.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1945 OF 2007
Smt.Ranjana Pandharinath Gage
and 4 Ors. ..Petitioners.
Versus
Nashik Shikshan Prasarak Mandal
and Anr. ..Respondents.
..
Mr.Girish Agrawal, Adv. i/b. R.M.Agrawal & Asso.
for the petitioners.
Mr.A.R.Patil, APP, for the State.
CORAM : S.B.MHASE AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATED : DECEMBER 17, 2007.
P.C.:-
1. This is a Petition for quashing the FIR.
However the charge-sheet has already been filed and,
therefore, we refrain from entertaining the Petition.
Petition is rejected.
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [S.B.MHASE,J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to quash the FIR when the charge-sheet has already been filed?
Smt.Ranjana Pandharinath Gage
Nashik Shikshan Prasarak Mandal
S.B.Mhase
V.K.Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court