Writ petition declared infructuous as the main suit had been disposed of. Petition disposed of without adjudication on merits. All contentions kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1937 OF 2007
Municipal Corporation of the City of Pune
....Petitioner
V/s
Nitin Dwarkadas Nyati & Ors.
....Respondents
Mr. R.G. Ketkar for the Petitioner.
Mr. S.A. Rajeshinde for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 3rd October, 2007.
P.C.:
The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 submits that the main suit has already been disposed of and, therefore, this Writ Petition has become infructuous. Mr. Ketkar, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, submits that he has taken instructions and he was informed that the suit has been disposed of. Hence, Writ Petition does not survive. Petition is disposed of since it has become infructuous. All contentions are kept open.
(V.M. KANADE, J.)
2
Municipal Corporation of the City of Pune
Nitin Dwarkadas Nyati
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
