Petitioner in a criminal writ petition approached the court after the detention order lapsed. Bench dismissed the petition as infructuous since the petitioner was released.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MSS
: 1 :
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1931 OF 2006
---------------------------------------------------------
Office notes, office : Memoranda of Coram, :
appearances, Court’s : Court’s or Judge’s Orders orders
or directions : & Registrar’s orders. : .
---------------------------------------------------------
Mrs. S. D. Shinde, APP
CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI &
D. B. BHOSALE, JJ.
DATED:-4/6/2007
P.C.:-
None for the petitioner. Mrs.
Shinde, the learned APP states that
the period of detention under order of
detention dated 12/9/05 is over. The
petitioner has already been released
from jail. Hence the petition has
become infructuous.
In the circumstances, the petition
is disposed of as infructuous.
JUDGE.
JUDGE.
MSS
State
Ranjana Desai
D. B. Bhosale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court