The petitioner challenged an order of detention under a writ petition. The court observed that the period of detention had expired and the detenu was released.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MSS
: 1 :
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1814 OF 2006
---------------------------------------------------------
Office notes, office : Memoranda of Coram, :
appearances, Court’s : Court’s or Judge’s Orders orders
or directions : & Registrar’s orders. : .
---------------------------------------------------------
Mr. S. R. Borulkar, PP
CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI &
D. B. BHOSALE, JJ.
DATED:-4/6/2007
P.C.:-
None for the petitioner. Mr.
Borulkar, the learned PP states that
the period of detention under order of
detention dated 22/3/06 is over. The
detenu has already been released from
jail. Hence the petition has become
infructuous.
In the circumstances, the petition
is disposed of as infructuous.
JUDGE.
JUDGE.
MSS
RANJANA DESAI
D. B. BHOSALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court