This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
DISTRICT :
WRIT PETITION NO.1851 OF 2006
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s
of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.Mandar Limaye for the Petitioner.
Mr.Amit Shete h/f. Mr.A.B. Borkar
for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.
DATED : 11TH JANUARY, 2007
P.C:
The learned counsel for the
Respondent states that the suit has
been finally disposed of. In view of
this statement, the Writ Petition does
not survive.
2. It is however clarified that the
Petitioner shall be entitled to
challenge the impugned order from the
final decree, if passed.
3. Writ Petition is accordingly
disposed of.
Petitioner
Respondents 1 to 3
S.J. VAZIFDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court