In this writ petition, the Court disposed of the challenge to an order requiring the petitioner to vacate a site. The Court held that the impugned order warranted no interference as the petitioner lacked a valid license to remain, granting four weeks to vacate.
Four weeks granted to vacate the site.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITIN NO.1994 OF 2006
Tukaram S. Jambhale....Petitioner
V/s.
Solapur Municipal Corporation
through its Commissioner
....Respondent
Mr.V.V. Purwant for the Petitioner.
Mr.V.B. Nail with Mr.R.S. Alange for the Respondent.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.
DATED : 10TH JANUARY, 2007.
P.C. :
1.In the event the Petitioner making a fresh
application for allotment of an alternate site, the
concerned authorities shall decide the same within
four weeks from the date of receipt of such
application. The application shall be made to
Respondent No.1.
2.The impugned order warrants no interference
as the Petitioner is unable to show any right to
remain on the site without valid license. As a matter
of indulgence, he is granted four weeks time to vacate
the site.
3.The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order warrants interference.
Whether the petitioner has a right to remain on the site without a valid license.
Tukaram S. Jambhale
Solapur Municipal Corporation
S.J. VAZIFDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court