Parties settled the dispute and submitted signed Consent Minutes. The court accepted the set‑tlement and disposed of the writ petition in terms of the consent.
Writ petition disposed in terms of signed Consent Minutes filed by parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
WRIT PETITION NO.1640 OF 2007
------------------------------------:----------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders.
coram, appearances, Court’s orders :
or directions and Registrar’s :
orders. :
------------------------------------:-----------------------------------
Mr Sanjay Udeshi, for the petitioner.
Mr Avinash Jalisatgi, for the
respondents.
CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE,J.
DATED: 10th October,2007.
P.C.:
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Learned counsel for the parties state
that the parties have settled the dispute
and they have tendered Consent Minutes of
Order duly signed by the petitioner and
respondent no.1 and their advocates on
record. The Consent Minutes of Order is
taken on record and marked "X" for
identification. The undertaking/statements
made in the Consent Minutes of Order are
accepted. Parties are present in the Court.
The writ petition stands disposed of in
terms of the Consent Minutes of Order.
(D.B.BHOSALE,J.)
Petitioner
Respondent No.1
Bhoshale, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court