Dismissed
Sonia Divanssingh Arora v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCWP/1623/2007
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition was allowed to be withdrawn on oral motion and disposed of accordingly.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1623 OF 2007
Sonia Divanssingh Arora ..Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
Mr.Ashish Savant i/b M.K.Kocharekar Advocate for
Petitioner
Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh APP for State
CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 11, 2007
P.C.:
1. On the oral motion made by the learned Advocate
for the Petitioner, petition is allowed to be
withdrawn and stands disposed of accordingly.
[R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J.]
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Sonia Divanssingh Arora
The State of Maharashtra
R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court