Javed Sikandar Mulla v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant filed a criminal appeal and subsequently moved an oral motion to withdraw it. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the application.
The applicant filed a criminal appeal and subsequently moved an oral motion to withdraw it. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.533 OF 2007
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1214 OF 2005
Javed Sikandar Mulla
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra
...Applicant
...Respondent
Shri. A.B. Vagyani, Advocate, for the Applicant.
Smt. A.S. Pai, APP, for the Respondent.
CORAM : R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR &
SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATE : 10TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
P.C. :
1.On oral motion made by the learned Advocate
for the applicant, the Application is allowed to be
withdrawn and stands disposed of accordingly.
Javed Sikandar Mulla
The State of Maharashtra
R.M.S. Khandeparkar
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court