The High Court disposed of a writ petition wherein the respondents agreed to forward the petitioner's representation to the State Education Inspector within six weeks for an appropriate order.
Disposed of the writ petition; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
WRIT PETITION NO.1600 OF 2006
Abdul Bari Shaikh
..Petitioner.
Vs.
Education Inspector & Ors.
..Respondents.
Mr. A.N. Mulla for the Petitioner. Ms. S.M. Dandekar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4. Mr. S.N. Masih for Respondent No.3.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
6th August, 2007.
P.C. :
The learned counsel appearing for the respective Respondents submit that if the Petitioner shall make a fresh representation in relation to the reliefs claimed, this shall be forwarded by the Management to the Education Inspector, State of Maharashtra who in turn shall take appropriate steps and pass an order in accordance with law. The Respondents will abide by the statement and appropriate order will be passed within six weeks from the date of representation.
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
There shall be no order as to costs.
2
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Abdul Bari Shaikh
Education Inspector & Ors.
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
