Petitioner's writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as no advocate appeared on behalf of the petitioner during the afternoon session of the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1138 OF 2007
Nazma Samsher Shaikh ..Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
& Ors. ..Respondents
...
None for Petitioner
CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 01, 2007
P.C.:
1. When the matter was called out in the morning
session of the day, at the request of the learned
advocate for the Petitioner, the same was kept back
for hearing in the after-noon session. When the
matter is called out in the after-noon session,
nobody appeared for the Petitioner. Petition is,
therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution.
[R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J.]
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Nazma Samsher Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
R.M.S.Khandeparkar
V.K.Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court