The court dismissed the writ petition as barred since an identical prayer seeking cancellation of prison punishment was previously denied in Criminal Writ Petition No.176 of 2006.
Petition disposed of as identical prayer previously rejected in CWP No.176 of 2006.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1002 OF 2007
Dnyanoba Sakharam Vikhe ..Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
...
Mr.Vinod Wagh i/b Ms.Anjali Iyyer Advocate
(appointed) for Petitioner
Mrs.U.V.Kejariwal APP for State
CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 05, 2007
P.C.:
1. Heard. The Petitioner had surrendered late by
1552 days, hence prison punishment came to be
imposed on the prisoner and his name was removed
from the book of prisoners entitled to remission.
The Petitioner is seeking cancellation of the said
prison punishment. It is seen that Petitioner had
earlier preferred Criminal Writ Petition No.176 of
2006 in which the very same prayer was made by the
- 2 -
Petitioner. By order dated 13th July, 2006, the
said petition came to be dismissed. In this view
of the matter, the present petition cannot be
entertained and is disposed of as such.
[R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J.]
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition should be entertained given the earlier dismissal of identical prayers in Criminal Writ Petition No.176 of 2006.
Dnyanoba Sakharam Vikhe
The State of Maharashtra
R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court