Ram Hardayal Vazirani. v. Vijay Hardayal Vazirani.
Case brief
What is this about?
Suit for letters of administration dismissed for want of prosecution as neither party appeared.
What did the court decide?
Suit dismissed for non-prosecution.
Suit for letters of administration dismissed for want of prosecution as neither party appeared.
Suit dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.48 OF 2006
Petition for Letter of Administration
(with a photocopy of the Will annexed)
to the properties and credits of Mrs.
Gomati alias Gomti Hardayal Vazirani,
widow Hindu, Inhabitant of Mumbai.
...Deceased
Mr.Ram Hardayal Vazirani
(son of deceased)
...Petitioner
CORAM: A.S.OKA,J.
DATE : OCTOBER 5,2007
P.C.:
1. On 21st September 2007 when this suit appeared on board,
none appeared for the parties. Therefore, the suit was
adjourned till today. When the suit is called out today, none
appears for the parties. Hence, dismissed for non
prosecution.
JUDGE
Mr. Ram Hardayal Vazirani
A.S. OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court