Single-judge bench dismissed second appeal as no substantial question of law arose. Court held issue regarding whether custom permits divorce is a question of fact.
Second appeal dismissed as no substantial question of law arose.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
SECOND APPEAL NO.198 OF 2007
Kisan Vitthal Kakad and others .. Appellants v/s. Smt. Sonubai Vitthal Kakad .. Respondent
Mr. S.M. Gorwadkar for the appellants.
CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 10TH JULY, 2007
P.C.
Heard counsel for the appellants.
3, There is no reason, therefore, to interfere in exercise of the second appeal. No substantial question of law arises for consideration. Dismissed.
(A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the custom permitting divorce is a question of law or fact.
Whether interference in second appeal is warranted when no substantial question of law arises.
Kisan Vitthal Kakad and others
Smt. Sonubai Vitthal Kakad
A.M. KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
