HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO.155 OF 2007
Bapu Nivrutti Jadhav(deceased)
by L.Rs. ..Appellants.
V/s.
Tukaram Vithoba Aaldar(deceased)
by L.Rs. ..Respondents.
Mr.Umesh Manakapure for appellants.
CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J
DATE : JULY 9, 2007.
P.C. :
1. In view of the concurrent finding of fact, no
interference is warranted. Argument that the Courts
below have not considered the evidence in its proper
perspective is only an argument to persuade this
Court to reconsider the evidence on record. That
cannot be the scope of Second Appeal. No substantial
question of law is arising for consideration. Hence,
dismissed.
Bapu Nivrutti Jadhav(deceased) by L.Rs.
Tukaram Vithoba Aaldar(deceased) by L.Rs.
A.M.KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court