Dattaram Nhanu Munankar v. Ramchandra Nhanu Munankar
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal dismissed without considering the case because no substantial question of law arose based on concurrent finding of facts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO.185 OF 2007
Dattaram N. Munankar & Anr. ..Appellants.
V/s.
Ramchandrad N. Munankar & Anr. ..Respondents.
Mr.Khandeparkar for appellants.
CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J
DATE : JULY 9, 2007.
P.C. :
1. Heard counsel for the appellants.
2. Having regard to the concurrent finding of
the facts, in my opinion, no substantial question of
law arises for consideration. Hence, dismissed.
Dattaram N. Munankar & Anr.
Ramchandrad N. Munankar & Anr.
A.M.KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court