Review petition in writ petition regarding Article 226 matter dismissed as no error of law apparent on the face of the record was disclosed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDCITION
REVIEW PETITION NO. 125 OF 2007
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 6410 OF 2006
Anil Popat Jadhav ... Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. A.P. Vanarse with Mr. J.N. Tanpure for the
Petitioner.
Ms. Nisha Valani for R. Nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: OCTOBER 19, 2007
P.C.
. Nothing has been brought to our attention
disclosing any error of law apparent on the face of
record. Hence, review Petition dismissed.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Anil Popat Jadhav
Union of India
F. I. Rebello
J. P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court