General Employees Union v. M/S Inter Gold (India) Pvt. Ltd. and 7 Ors.
Bombay HCNMW/455/2007
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
An advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner moved a motion seeking placement of the writ petition for hearing. The court held the present motion was not pressed due to the scheduling of the main petition and disposed of the notice accordingly.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
MST
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.455 OF 2007
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2513 OF 2006
¶4
General Employees’ Union Petitioner
versus
M/s.Intergold (I) Pvt.Ltd.
and others Respondents
¶5
Mr.R.D.Bhat for petitioner in support of NMS.
¶6
Mr.J.P.Cama, Sr.Counsel i/by S.Udeshi & Co. for
respondents.
¶7
CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
¶8
DATE : 19th November 2007
¶9
PC :
¶10
1. Place Writ Petition No.2513 of 2006 for final
¶11
hearing in the week commencing from 04th December
2007 as per its turn. In view of this order,
present motion is not pressed. Same is disposed
of.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
General Employees' Union
- respondent
M/s.Intergold (I) Pvt.Ltd.
Coram
AI extract
A.M. KHANWILKAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court