Disposed
Mahanagar Telephone Nigamltd v. M/S Neon Trading Corpn
Bombay HCS/1825/1990
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
S.C.SUIT NO.1825 OF 1990
M.T.N.Limited ..Plaintiffs.
V/s.
M/s.Neon Trading Corporation ..Defendants.
Mr.S.R.Rajguru for Plaintiffs.
Mr.R.L.Dharia for Defendants.
CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J
DATE : NOVEMBER 2, 2007.
P.C. :
1. Counsel for the Plaintiffs states that
instructions have been received that entire telephone
demand bill has been paid by the Defendants. In the
circumstances, the Suit is allowed to be withdrawn
unconditionally. Refund as per rule.
(A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)
A.M.Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court