A.F. Ferguson and Co. v. Union of India and Ors.
Bombay HCNMW/6/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶2
Notice of Motion No.6 of 2007
in
Writ Petition No. 3037 of 2003
¶3
A.F.Ferguson and Co. ..Petitioners
¶4
vs.
¶5
Union of India and ors. ..Respondents
¶6
Mr.Vinit Naik i/b Pandya Gandhi and Co. for applicants.
Mr.P.C.Ghandy i/b M/s C.Bayley and co. for original
petitioners.
¶7
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR C.J.
AND S.C.DHARMADHIKARIJ.
19th June, 2007
¶8
P.C.
¶9
1. We have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the
¶10
parties. Notice of motion is allowed subject to just
exceptions. Petition be listed for hearing after 8 weeks
i.e. on 14th August, 2007.
¶11
2. Notice of motion made absolute.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
A.F. Ferguson and Co.
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
AI extract
Swatanter Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court