An interim order granting a motion. The High Court of Bombay granted a motion based on an affidavit, and listed a subsequent notice of motion for an ad-interim hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J.
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2290 OF 2007 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2225 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO. 1618 OF 2007
Shri Ramnath Enterprises and others .. Plaintiffs v/s. Sonal Sunil Kothare .. Defendant
Mr. R.V. Govilkar for the plaintiffs. Ms. Jyotsna Pandhi for the defendant.
CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 25TH JUNE, 2007
P.C.
For the reasons mentioned in the affidavit in support of the motion, motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.)
Shri Ramnath Enterprises and others
Sonal Sunil Kothare
A.M. KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
