This order by the Bombay High Court granted the petition to condone the delay in filing Notice of Motion No. 1305 of 2006 in Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 356 of 2006, conditioning registration of the appeal by the office.
Condonation of delay; order to register the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1305 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 356 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax .... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Regal Shoes ... Respondent
Mr. B.M. Chatterjee with Ms. P.P. Bhosale and
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellants.
Mr. Percy Pardiwala with Ms.Chaitra Rao i/by M &M
Legal Venture for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: OCTOBER 03, 2007
P.C.:
. Heard parties.
. Considering the cause shown,, in our opinion,
this will amount to sufficient cause. Hence, delay
condoned. Office to register the appeal.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the income tax appeal was sufficient to be condoned.
The Commissioner of Income Tax
M/s. Regal Shoes
F.I. Rebello
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court