Dismissed
The Commissioner OFDINCOME-TAX-CITY-16 v. Shri Rakesh Sekhsaria
Bombay HCITXA/2679/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 494 OF 2005
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1366 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
Mr. Rakesh Sakhsaria ... Respondent
Mr. A.S. Rao for the Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: OCTOBER 03, 2007
P.C.:
. On behalf of the Revenue, the learned counsel
states that he has been informed that the assessee
has expired some time in the years 2004. Till date,
they have no knowledge of the legal heirs.
Considering the above, in our opinion, the motion
and appeal as filed stands abated and hence,
dismissed as abated.
. We make it clear that it will be open to the
Revenue to apply for setting aside the abatement, if
in law they are entitled to make such an
application.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Commissioner of Income Tax
Mr. Rakesh Sakhsaria
F.I. Rebello
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court