Appeal and application against Single Judge order permitting nominee representation. Bench found no legal error and no need to interfere with impugned order on facts.
Letters Patent Appeal dismissed; Civil Application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.67 OF 2007
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.77 OF 2007
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.6819 OF 2006
Mysore Petrochemicals Ltd. & Ors.
...Appellants/ Applicants
V/s.
Dastgir Alam Mulla & Ors.
...Respondents
None for the appellants-applicants.
Mr.N.G. Helekar, Advocate, for Respondent No.1.
Mr.R.M. Patne, AGP, for Respondent Nos.2 & 3.
CORAM : J.N. PATEL & A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 13TH AUGUST, 2007.
| P.C.: | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | None for the Appe | llants-Applicants. | ||
| 2. | Heard. | |||
| 3. | This Letters Pate | nt Appeal has been filed by | ||
| the | Appellants-employers | impugning the judgment |
of |
the |
| learned | Single Judge, |
wherein the learned |
Single | Judge |
| found | that the Respo |
ndent can be permitted |
to |
be |
represented by his nominee in the departmental enquiry.
| 4. | We find that | the view taken by the | learned | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single | Judge cannot |
be said to |
be | contrary | to the |
law. |
| We | further find that |
the enquiry |
is | prolonged | mainly | on |
| this | trivial issue. |
Therefore, | in | the | facts | and |
circumstances, we are not inclined to interfere with
the impugned order.
Appeal, the Civil Application does not survive and the
same stands disposed of accordingly.
[A.A. SAYED, J.]
[J.N. PATEL, J.]
Mysore Petrochemicals Ltd. & Ors.
Dastgir Alam Mulla & Ors.
J.N. Patel
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
