This single-judge order notes the appearance of counsel and condones the delay in condonation of delay application, listing the matter for admission and stay on a future date.
Delay condoned; matter listed for admission and stay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3 OF 2007
IN
CONTEMPT APPEAL ST. NO. 10207 OF 2007
Municipal Corporation of
Greater Mumbai. .. Applicants..
vs.
Prakash J. Shetty. .. Respondent.
Mr. Y.K. Sakhare, Sr. Advocate for Applicants.
None for respondent.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL &,
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE: 9TH AUGUST 2007.
P.C.
. The learned Senior Advocate appearing for the
applicants states that the respondent has been served
personally and he will be filing affidavit of service
within a week’s time.
2. Heard.
3. This is an application for condonation of
delay. For the reasons stated in the application,
delay is condoned. List the matter for admission and
stay on 28.8.2007.
(J.N. Patel, J.)
2
(A.A. Sayed, J. )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay in filing the application?
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Prakash J. Shetty
J.N. PATEL
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court