In Wealth Tax Appeal No.751 of 2004, the High Court at Bombay dismissed the appeal, holding that the question of law was already covered by its judgment in Wealth Tax Appeal No.313 of 2003.
The appeal is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICITON
WEALTH TAX APPEAL NO.751 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Wealth Tax .. Applicant.
Versus
M/s.Sandoz Textiles & Trading
Pvt. Limited. .. Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr.A.S. Rao and Mr.P.S.
Sahadevan for the applicant.
Mr.J.D. Mistry with Mr.Raj Darak for the respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 24TH OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :
1. The question of law as formulated in this
appeal is covered by the judgment of this Court in
Wealth Tax Appeal No.313 of 2003 decided on
24-10-2007 (CIT V/s. M/s.Akshya Textiles Trading &
Agencies Pvt.Ltd.)
2. Considering the above, the question of law
as framed would not arise and consequently the
appeal is dismissed.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
CIT V/s. M/s. Akshya Textiles Trading & Agencies Pvt. Ltd.Followed¶1
Wealth Tax Appeal No.313 of 2003
The Commissioner of Wealth Tax
M/s. Sandoz Textiles & Trading Pvt. Limited.
F.I. Rebello
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court