The Income Tax Appeal by Godrej Industries Ltd. was allowed to be withdrawn at the request of the learned counsel for the appellants, citing a Supreme Court judgment against the assessee.
Leave to withdraw the appeal allowed; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.531 OF 2004
IN
I.T.APPEAL NO.658 & 659/MUMBAI/1999
Godrej Industries Ltd. .. Appellants
V/s
Commissioner of Income Tax
Mumbai City X, Mumbai .. Respondent
Ms.Samidha Vedpathak i/by M/s.Maneksha & Sethna for the
Appellants.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN&
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 13th February, 2007.
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellants. The
learned Counsel for the Appellants states that the issue
raised in this Appeal is clearly covered by the Judgment
of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Britania
Industries Ltd V/s.Commissioner of Income Tax & Another
- (2005) 278 ITR 546 (SC), against the Assessee. In
view thereof, the learned Counsel for the Appellant
seeks leave to withdraw this Appeal. Appeal is
therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Britania Industries Ltd V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax & AnotherReferred¶10
(2005) 278 ITR 546 (SC)
Godrej Industries Ltd.
Commissioner of Income Tax Mumbai City X
D.R. Radhakrishnan
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court