This short order dismisses an Income Tax Appeal upon the appellant seeking leave to withdraw the appeal, resulting in the disposal of the associated notice of motion.
Appeal allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such; court fee refunded; notice of motion disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.735 of 2004. WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION No. 1753 of 2004
The Commissioner of Income-tax City-XVI, Mumbai. ..Appellant.
Vs.
R. K. Sanghvi.
..Respondent.
Mr R.G.Bhat for the Appellant.
Ms A. Vissanji with S.P.Mehta for the respondent.
CORAM:DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND V.C. DAGA,JJ. DATED:19th June, 2007.
P.C.:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
above appeal as per rules.
notice of motion does not survive and notice of motion stands disposed of accordingly.
(V.C. DAGA,J.) (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Commissioner of Income-tax City-XVI, Mumbai
R. K. Sanghvi
DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN
V.C. DAGA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
