The Income Tax Appeal was allowed to be withdrawn upon application. The appeal and the associated notice of motion were disposed of accordingly, with court fee to be refunded.
Allowance of withdrawal of the appeal; dismissal of the appeal; refund of court fee; disposal of the notice of motion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.737 of 2004. WITH NOTICE OF MOTION No. 1676 of 2004
The Commissioner of Income-tax City-XVII, Mumbai. ..Appellant.
Vs.
M/s Diamond Tiles.
..Respondent.
Mr R.G.Bhat for the Appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM:DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND V.C. DAGA,JJ. DATED:19th June, 2007.
P.C.:-
appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
above appeal as per rules.
notice of motion does not survive and notice
of motion stands disposed of accordingly.
(V.C. DAGA,J.)
(DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
The Commissioner of Income-tax City-XVII, Mumbai
M/s Diamond Tiles
DR. S. Radhakrishnan
V.C. Daga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
