Allowed
The State of Maharashtra v. Janardhan Dnyanoba Gaikwad
Bombay HCFA/713/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET
FIRST APPEAL NO.713 OF 2006
Office Notes,Office
memorandum of Coram,
appearances,Court’s
orders or directions
& Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or
Judge’s orders
Ms G.P.Mulekar, A.G.P. for State
Mr.Sachin Punde for the Respondent.
CORAM: A.S.OKA, J.
DATE : JANUARY 8,2007.
P.C.:
1. Admit. The Respondent waives service.
Printing is dispensed with.
2. Private Paperbook along with Decree
Form shall be filed by the Appellant
within a period of one year from today.
If compliance is not made within
stipulated time, the Appeal shall stand
dismissed for want of prosecution without
further reference to the court.
JUDGE
State
Respondent
A.S. OKA, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court