The High Court ordered the Registry to recover the deficit court fee from the appellant and disposed of the First Appeal without elaboration.
Directing the Registry to recover deficit court fee from the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR.
First Appeal No. 353 of 1994(Decided)
(Akbar Khan & anr. Vs. Dinkar Dilip Madavi & ors.)
Appeal Application No. Writ petition
District : of 200
Court's or Judge's Orders
Mr. A.J. Khan, Adv. for the appellants. CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J. DATE : 29th August, 2007
The Registry to recover the deficit Court fee from the appellant in accordance with the Rules.
JUDGE
RMP
Akbar Khan & anr.
Dinkar Dilip Madavi & ors.
Vasanti A. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
