Dismissed
Balaram Vetu Mali v. Hiraji Narayan Patil
Bombay HCFA/21/2002
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 21 OF 2002
Balaram Vetu Mali..Appellant
V/s
Hiraji Narayan Patil..Respondent
Mr. N.V. Bandiwadekar for the apellant.
Ms Sharvari Shailendra i/b Mr.P.S. Dani for the
respondent
P.C.
.The learned Counsel for the appellant do not
want to prosecute the appeal and wants to withdraw
the appeal. The respondent has no objection. The
appeal is permitted to be withdrawn. Appeal is
dismissed as withdrawn. The appellant would be
entitled for refund of court fees, as permissible
under the rules.
Balaram Vetu Mali
Hiraji Narayan Patil
P.C.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court