Mehul Enterprises v. Kalyan Oil and Soaps Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Bombay HCCP/724/1999
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
INININ THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
ssm
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
¶3
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶4
COMPANY PETITION NO. 724 OF1999
¶5
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda
of Coram, appearances, Court’s
Orders or directions and
Registrar’s OrdersCourt’s or Judge’s Orders
¶6
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
¶7
Mr. Santosh Thakur i/by Mr.
Subhash Jha for the petitioner.
¶8
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.
DATED : 19th October, 2007
P.C.
¶9
1. There is no compliance of
order dated 15/07/2005 till this
date. Therefore, the order was
passed on 12/10/2007 and one week
time was granted and the matter
was adjourned for dismissal. The
same request is made today again.
The petition is, therefore,
dismissed for want of
prosecution, with liberty.
¶10
(ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Mr. Santosh Thakur
Coram
AI extract
Anoop V. Mohta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court