Meena v. Matta v Bedekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd.
Bombay HCCP/240/2001
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court directed the petitioner to file an affidavit of publication and issue Rule 28 notice within ten weeks or face dismissal of Company Petition No. 240 of 2001.
What the court decided
AI extract
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
ssm
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
¶3
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶4
COMPANY PETITION NO. 240 OF2001
¶5
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda
of Coram, appearances, Court’s
Orders or directions and
Registrar’s OrdersCourt’s or Judge’s Orders
¶6
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
¶7
Mr. H.J.Kanojia i/by M/s. Kiran Jain &
Co. for the petitioner.
¶8
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.
¶9
DATED : 19th October, 2007
¶10
P.C.
¶11
1. The petitioner to take steps within
ten weeks, to file the affidavit of
publication if not filed and or if not
dispensed with and for notice under Rule
28 of the Company Court Rules, if not
sent. The petitioners if, fail to take
steps within ten weeks, the petition shall
stand dismissed without referring to
Court’s order. The concerned office
should also take steps to issue notice,
accordingly without delay.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Respondents
Coram
AI extract
Anoop V. Mohta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court