Mukesh Jayantilal Sangani v. Viacom Electronics Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C.…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
COMPANY PETITION NO.68 OF 2001
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s Orders
Ms.R.Katkoria i/b.M/s.Shah & Sanghavi for the petitioners.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.
DATED : 25th October, 2007
P.C.
| The | petitioners | to take steps |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| within | twelve | week | s including the |
|
| filing | of | affidavit | of publication |
|
| if | not | fil | ed and |
if not dispensed |
| with | & | for | notice un |
der Rule 28 of |
| the | Com | pany | Court | Rules, if not |
| sent. | If | petitioners | fail to take |
|
| steps | wit | hin | twelve | weeks, the |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court