The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed an application for condonation of delay of 53 days in filing a Civil Appeal (ST), finding it in the interest of justice and disposing of the application.
Delay of 53 days in filing appeal is condoned; application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3844 OF 2006
IN
FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.18545 OF2006
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda
of Coram, appearances, Court’s
Orders or directions and
Registrar’s OrdersCourt’s or Judge’s Orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mr. Sunil Patil i/by Mr.
S.D.Patil for the applicants.
Mr. Prashant Patil i/by Mr.
Umesh Mankapure for respondent
Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.
DATED : 24th October, 2007.
P.C.
1. This is an application in the
appeal filed by the original
claimant for enhancement of the
compensation, as there is delay
of 53 days in filing the present
appeal. Therefore, prays for
condonation of delay.
2. Considering the averments
made, in the interest of justice,
( 2 )
the said delay is condoned. The
application is allowed in terms
of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
3. The application is disposed
of accordingly. Appeal be listed
for admission, subject to
numbering.
[ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay of 53 days in filing a civil appeal.
Applicants
Respondents Nos. 1 and 2
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court