Company petitions filed by six individuals against TME Plasmetrronics Pvt. Ltd. were disposed by the High Court of Bombay after a winding up order was passed in a related petition, reserving claims for the liquidation proceedings.
Petitions disposed with liberty to raise claims before the Liquidator.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.
COMPANY PETITION NO.434 OF 1999 WITH
COMPANY PETITION NOS.435, 436, 437, 1166 & 1167 OF 1999
CP 434/99 :
Rasik M. Shah. Vs. TME Plasmetrronics Pvt.Ltd. .... CP 435/99 :
...Petitioner.
...Respondent.
Paras M. Shah. Vs. TME Plasmetrronics Pvt.Ltd. .... CP 436/99 :
...Petitioner.
...Respondent.
Badrauddin P. Hirani. Vs. TME Plasmetrronics Pvt.Ltd. .... CP 437/99 :
...Petitioner.
...Respondent.
Nuruddin B. Hiraji. Vs. TME Plasmetrronics Pvt.Ltd. .... CP 1166/99 :
...Petitioner.
...Respondent.
Smt. Veena J. Jainani. Vs. TME Plasmetrronics Pvt.Ltd.
...Petitioner.
...Respondent.
2
CP 1167/99 :
Smt.Jaya M. Jainani. Vs. TME Plasmetrronics Pvt.Ltd.
...Petitioner.
...Respondent.
Ms.Neeta Solanki i/b. K.P. Jain for the Petitioners. None for the Respondent.
CORAM :DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J . April 11, 2007. P.C .:
An order of winding up has been passed in Company Petition No.548 of 1997. In the circumstances, on the request of Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners, this batch of petitions is disposed of with liberty reserved to the Petitioners to raise their claims before the Liquidator in the liquidation proceedings.
Rasik M. Shah
Paras M. Shah
Badrauddin P. Hirani
Nuruddin B. Hiraji
Smt. Veena J. Jainani
Smt. Jaya M. Jainani
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
