In Company Petition 37 of 1998, the court disposed of the petition without merits because a winding-up order was already passed in a prior liquidation proceeding against the respondent.
Petition disposed with liberty reserved for creditors to raise claims before the Official Liquidator in existing liquidation proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
COMPANY PETITION NO. 37 of 1998
Indusind Bank Ltd. ... Petitioner.
V/s.
M/s. Jayanti Business Machines Ltd. ...Respondents.
None for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents.
CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J.
10th April 2007.
P.C. :
. The Company Registrar has drawn the attention of the Court to the fact that an order of winding up has already been passed on 21st July 2005 by Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar in Company Petition 859 of 1997 against the Respondent Company. That being the position, it would be open to the Petitioner to
raise his claims before the Official Liquidator in
the liquidation proceeding.
of with liberty so reserved.
Indusind Bank Ltd.
M/s. Jayanti Business Machines Ltd.
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
