Petitioner sought amendment to the writ petition based on subsequent events during pendency; chamber summons allowed with timeline for amendment and reply.
Amendment to the petition allowed within 4 weeks; reply to be filed within 4 weeks thereafter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.J.C. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.233 OF 2007 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1597 OF 2002
Abhay S. Dighe .... Petitioner. V/s. Union of India & Ors. .... Respondents.
Mr.S.V.Marne i/b. K.Babu Rajan for petitioner. Mr.Suresh Kumar for responddents.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
DATED : 23RD NOVEMBER, 2007.
P.C. :
Heard counsel appearing for parties. The application
for amedment to the petition is primarily based on subsequent events that occurred during the pendency of the petition. Chamber summons is allowed. Amendment to be carried out within 4 weeks from today. Reply to be filed within 4 weeks thereafter. Liberty to take cross objections, if advised.
Chamber summons disposed of accordingly.
CHIEF JUSTICE
J.P.DEVADHAR,
J.
Abhay S. Dighe
Union of India & Ors.
Swatanter Kumar
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
