This order dismisses a civil application for extension of time in a writ petition related to caste scrutiny as infructuous on the assumption that the matter had been disposed of by the relevant committee.
The application for extension of time is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 939 OF 2007
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 2726 OF 2003
The State of Maharashtra
& Ors. .. Petitioners.
vs.
Dattatraya Deoram Koli. .. Respondent.
Mr. C.R. Sonawane, AGP., for the petitioners.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL &
SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ.
DATE: 20TH NOVEMBER, 2007.
P.C.
. The application for extension of time is
pending in this Court since long. By this time
probably the Caste Scrutiny Committee must have
disposed of the application. Therefore, no orders are
necessary. The application is dismissed as
infructuous. No order as to costs.
(J.N. Patel, J.)
2
(Smt. Nishita Mhatre, J.)
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Dattatraya Deoram Koli
J.N. Patel
Nishita Mhatre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court