HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE…
The application for interim stay is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 357 OF 2006
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 4180 OF 2004
The State of Maharashtra
& Ors. .. Petitioners.
vs.
Nanasaheb Nimba Bagul & Ors. .. Respondents.
Mr. Rahul Matkar i/by A.R. Shaikh
for respondent nos. 1 & 2.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL &
SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ.
DATE: 20TH NOVEMBER, 2007.
P.C.
. None for the petitioners. The application for
interim stay is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(J.N. Patel, J.)
(Smt. Nishita Mhatre, J.)
2
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Nanasaheb Nimba Bagul & Ors.
J.N. PATEL
NISHITA MHATRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court