This court allowed a delay application in a review petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The judge noted a delay of five days and ordered the registration of the petition.
Delay of five days condoned; Review Petition ordered to be registered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE,CIVIL JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1862 OF 2007
IN
REVIEW PETITION ST. NO.9985 OF 2007
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1953 OF 2007
Deepika Subhash More ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors..Respondents
Mr. Y.S. Jahagirdar, Senior Advocate with Mr. R.K.
Mendadkar, for the Petitioner
Ms. M.P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 8TH AUGUST, 2007
P.C.:
. There is a delay of 5 days. For the cause
shown delay condoned. Office to register the Review
Petition.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Deepika Subhash More
The State of Maharashtra
F.I. Rebello
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court